That being said, I don't understand why changing 'for' this way would create problems for you
Perhaps I'm doing i from 1 to the number of things I have, and sometimes I have zero things.
Actually though it was a bit silly of me to suggest "forstep" when your version of "for" was doing what you wanted it to do. It's not a version that I'd want to use in my code, but that's no reason for you not to have your version.
