Arc Forumnew | comments | leaders | submitlogin
1 point by stefano 5914 days ago | link | parent

> That is much more complicated to implement, though, and requires environments as first-class objects.

Given the interpreted nature of Arc, first class environments shouldn't be too hard to implement, but in a compiled implementation it would be a lot more difficult.



2 points by rntz 5913 days ago | link

They could not be implemented on top of the existing arc-to-scheme translator, because that's what it is: an arc-to-scheme translator, not an interpreter. Scheme doesn't have first-class environments, so we can't shove them into arc without writing a full-fledged arc interpreter.

-----

1 point by stefano 5912 days ago | link

I've had a closer look at Arc2.tar. You're right. I thought that runtime environments were handled explicitly.

-----

1 point by almkglor 5914 days ago | link

Depending on how environments are handled.

If the environments are temporaries created only while processing macros, and are discarded afterwards, they don't necessarily have to be difficult for compilers.

-----