Arc Forumnew | comments | leaders | submitlogin
2 points by stefano 6091 days ago | link | parent

This is an idea to consider. This way though the binding could rapidly become fragmented and it will be more difficult to make it, one day, complete.


1 point by almkglor 6091 days ago | link

Hmm, how big is the change in the naming anyway? I mean, it could conceivably just be in the same state as 'cdar is in the language today - it's not there yet but there's a name reserved for it already.

-----

2 points by stefano 6091 days ago | link

The naming strictly follows gtk+ naming, with '_' replaced by '-'. As an example gtk_widget_show_all becomes gtk-widget-show-all. gtk+ names are so long that I think they will never collide with other names.

-----

2 points by almkglor 6090 days ago | link

Hmm. In such a case I doubt that lazy importing would hurt badly, since the names already unlikely to collide (not never - someone might make a Great Transformer Kollider library involving midgets, except they misspelled it as widgets (dyslexia's a bummer for programming you know, it's hard to see the difference between i and ! sometimes)); think of it as "cdar", which isn't in arc yet but which pg is too lazy to add "just for completeness".

-----