Wart isn't that different from arc, it still shows its roots.
for x 1 (x < 10) ++x
prn x
map prn '(1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10)
def (f n)
prn n
if (n < 10)
(f n+1)
f.1
Unlike smile it needs those parens around the if condition.
Edit 13 hours later: Ack, I was wrong. Wart would drop the parens just fine!
if n < 10
(f n+1)
I'm not sure I like it, but the design of infix fundamentally supports it by having higher precedence than function calls. If the infix operands grow complex it can get hard to read without parens.
if (function-call n x1 x2 x3) < 10
(f n+1)
# still works, but yuck..
Rather than compare it to arc, I found it tantalizing to think about how I'd implement that syntax. It looks like he's built objects for modules/namespaces, ranges, etc. But he's somehow supporting infix without spaces and also names like print-line. How does it work?! :)
Edit 8 minutes later: Also, the square brackets around the call to [f 1] are strange. If they're mandatory, there's something there I don't follow.
Interesting direction to take it. It would be interesting to know how he implemented it, so that he can still consider it to be a lisp. In particular that '#include' syntax sticks out a bit.
I also found it ironic how conflicted he is over its relationship with lisp.